Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/jspui/handle/123456789/9621
Registro completo de metadados
Campo Dublin CoreValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, Oscar William Barbosa-
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Débora Faria-
dc.contributor.authorSanson, Ananda Lima-
dc.contributor.authorCoutrim, Maurício Xavier-
dc.contributor.authorAfonso, Robson José de Cássia Franco-
dc.contributor.authorEichler, Paulo-
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Fernando-
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-13T16:00:35Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-13T16:00:35Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationFERNANDES, O. W. B. et al. influence of harvest season and maturation of different sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) cultivars on the chemical composition of alembic Brazilian sugarcane spirit. OALib Journal, v. 4, n. e3266, p. 1-16, 2017. Disponível em: <https://www.scirp.org/html/73483_73483.htm>. Acesso em: 15 set. 2017.pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn2333-9721-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.repositorio.ufop.br/handle/123456789/9621-
dc.description.abstractContrary to the ethanol industrial production, the quality and composition of sugar cane as raw material for the production of alembic cachaça have until now not been completely addressed. This work evaluated the influence of five different sugarcane cultivars and degree of maturation over the physicochemical composition of cachaça produced under strict controlled conditions. Three harvest seasons were used in order to obtain different stages of maturation. The sugarcane quality was assessed by the juice brix, sugarcane POL, reducing sugars, and purity. The cultivars quality did not differ within each harvest stage. However, significant quality differences were observed among sugarcane harvested in June and the other harvest months, particularly on reducing sugar content. This indicates different stages of sugarcane maturation. The 45 samples of cachaça produced from those sugarcanes were submitted to physicochemical and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) qualitative analysis. The GC/MS composition pattern showed that the type of cultivar did not alter the composition of the cachaça at the same harvest stage. Otherwise, the production of acetic acid, ethyl lactate and nbutyl alcohol was higher in the first harvest (June) when compared to the others. The results from sugar cane quality and GC/MS when submitted to principal component analysis (PCA) showed consistently the separation between the groups of cachaça produced in the three seasons, indicating the influence of sugarcane ripening over the cachaça composition.pt_BR
dc.language.isoen_USpt_BR
dc.rightsabertopt_BR
dc.subjectSugarcanept_BR
dc.subjectVolatile compoundspt_BR
dc.subjectHarvest seasonpt_BR
dc.subjectCachaçapt_BR
dc.titleInfluence of harvest season and maturation of different sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) cultivars on the chemical composition of alembic Brazilian sugarcane spirit.pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo publicado em periodicopt_BR
dc.rights.licenseThis work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY 4.0). Fonte: o próprio artigo.pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1103266-
Aparece nas coleções:DEQUI - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
ARTIGO_InfluenceHarvestSeason.pdf4,85 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.