Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/handle/123456789/8350
Title: Efficiently computing the drainage network on massive terrains using external memory flooding process.
Authors: Gomes, Thiago Luange
Magalhães, Salles Viana Gomes de
Andrade, Marcus Vinícius Alvim
Franklin, W. Randolph
Pena, Guilherme de Castro
Keywords: Terrain modeling
Hydrology
External memory
Issue Date: 2015
Citation: GOMES, T. L. et al. Efficiently computing the drainage network on massive terrains using external memory flooding process. Geoinformatica, Dordrecht, v. 19, p. 671-692, 2015. Disponível em: <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10707-015-0225-y>. Acesso em: 27 jul. 2017.
Abstract: We present EMFlow, a very efficient algorithm and its implementation, to compute the drainage network (i.e. the flow direction and flow accumulation) on huge terrains stored in external memory. Its utility lies in processing the large volume of high resolution terrestrial data newly available, which internal memory algorithms cannot handle efficiently. The flow direction is computed using an adaptation of our previous method RWFlood that uses a flooding process to quickly remove internal depressions or basins. Flooding, proceeding inward from the outside of the terrain, works oppositely to the common method of computing downhill flow from the peaks. To reduce the number of I/O operations, EMFlow adopts a new strategy to subdivide the terrain into islands that are processed separately. The terrain cells are grouped into blocks that are stored in a special data structure managed as a cache memory. EMFlow’s execution time was compared against the two most recent and most efficient published methods: TerraFlow and r.watershed.seg. It was, on average, 25 and 110 times faster than TerraFlow and r.watershed.seg respectively. Also, EMFlow could process larger datasets. Processing a 50000 × 50000 terrain on a machine with 2GB of internal memory took about 4500 seconds, compared to 87000 seconds for TerraFlow while r.watershed.seg failed on terrains larger than 15000×15000. On very small, say1000×1000 terrains, EMFlow takes under a second, compared to 6 and 20 seconds in r.watershed.seg and TerraFlow respectively. So EMFlow could be a component of a future interactive system where a user could modify terrain and immediately see the new hydrography
URI: http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/handle/123456789/8350
metadata.dc.identifier.uri2: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10707-015-0225-y
ISSN: 1573-7624
Appears in Collections:DECSI - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ARTIGO_EfficientlyComputingDrainage.pdf3,75 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.