Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://www.repositorio.ufop.br/jspui/handle/123456789/15307
Registro completo de metadados
Campo Dublin CoreValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorPinto, Arthur Bernardo Assumpção-
dc.contributor.authorAssis, Gilda Aparecida de-
dc.contributor.authorTorres, Luiz Carlos Bambirra-
dc.contributor.authorBeltrame, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorDomingues, Diana Maria Gallicchio-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-15T20:27:49Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-15T20:27:49Z-
dc.date.issued2022pt_BR
dc.identifier.citationARTHUR, B. A. et al. Wearables and detection of falls: a comparison of machine learning methods and sensors positioning. Neural Processing Letters, v. 54, p. 2165-2179, 2022. Disponível em: <https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11063-021-10724-2>. Acesso em: 29 abr. 2022.pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1573-773X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.repositorio.ufop.br/jspui/handle/123456789/15307-
dc.description.abstractWearable sensors have many applications to provide assistance for older adults. We aimed to identify the best combination of machine learning algorithms and body regions to attach one wearable for real-time falls detection from a public dataset where volunteers performed daily activities and simulated falls. Accuracy and comfort of the combination of wearables and algorithms were assessed. Raw data from the accelerometer and gyroscope were used for both training and testing stages. We evaluated the confusion matrix between all wear- ables at each of the different body regions (Ankle, Right Pocket, Belt, Neck, and Wrist) for the following machine learning algorithms: Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), Random Forest, XGBoost, and Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) deep neural network. The accuracy was compared by ANOVA two-way repeated measures statistical test. This work has two main technical contributions. First, our results demonstrated the highest accuracy in identifying falls when the sensors were positioned on the neck or ankle. Second, when the machine learning algorithms to detect fall was compared, LSTM deep neural network and Random Forest showed statistically higher accuracy than MLP and XGBoost. Besides, a comfort analysis based on the literature concluded that neck and wrist are the most comfortable regions to wear wearables.pt_BR
dc.language.isoen_USpt_BR
dc.rightsrestritopt_BR
dc.subjectFall detectionpt_BR
dc.subjectInertial sensorspt_BR
dc.titleWearables and detection of falls : a comparison of machine learning methods and sensors positioning.pt_BR
dc.typeArtigo publicado em periodicopt_BR
dc.identifier.uri2https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11063-021-10724-2pt_BR
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11063-021-10724-2pt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:DECSI - Artigos publicados em periódicos

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
ARTIGO_WearablesDetectionFalls.pdf
  Restricted Access
2,27 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.